- ckimstar's home page
- Posts
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (4)
- July (3)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (5)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2018
- December (5)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- March (4)
- February (4)
- January (5)
- 2017
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (4)
- September (5)
- August (6)
- July (2)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (5)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- 2016
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
RUN15 cell degradation study
- 1st update in July 22 Link
- New update (Aug. 1) - check attachment
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Update after Monday meeting at Aug. 5
a. Prepared multiple TH1 by eta group and comparison group (ex. day 8081 - day 7779)
b. Filled each delta_gainCorr (a cell's gainCorr difference between two different periods) into corresponding TH1
c. After filling TH1 is finished, used each TH1's mean and RMS to prepare delta_GC vs. period
* eta group is same to Monday report
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Comparison - all channels except bad/dead
1-a. eta group maps
1-b. TH1 by eta group
1-b-1. etaG = 0
1-b-2. etaG = 1
1-b-3. etaG = 2
1-b-4. etaG = 3
1-b-5. etaG = 4
1-c. delta_GC vs. period
1-d. delta_GC vs. period, in 2D (per Oleg's comment in Aug. 8)
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Comparison - only converged cells throughout entire periods
2-a. eta group maps
2-b. TH1 by eta group
2-b-1. etaG = 0
2-b-2. etaG = 1
2-b-3. etaG = 2
2-b-4. etaG = 3
2-b-5. etaG = 4
2-c. delta_GC vs. period
2-d. delta_GC vs. period, in 2D (per Oleg's comment in Aug. 8)
- ckimstar's blog
- Login or register to post comments