- dilks's home page
- Posts
- 2019
- 2018
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- August (2)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (5)
- 2017
- December (3)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (2)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- January (3)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (3)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (6)
- June (3)
- May (3)
- April (4)
- March (3)
- February (5)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (3)
- July (3)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (1)
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Run 12 Runset-Dependent Mass Cuts
Because mass peak drifts up as a function of run number for (viz.) small cells, I've decided to implement a runset-depenent mass cut for 6 energy bins. I am currently using a skewed-gaussian to fit the mass distribution, and cutting where the fit falls to 1/5 the peak height to the left and right of the peak.
ENERGY BINS
============
bin 0 -- 30-40
bin 1 -- 40-50
bin 2 -- 50-60
bin 3 -- 60-70
bin 4 -- 70-85
bin 5 -- 85-100
For each 2x2 group of plots, the top plots show the fit peak position (MassM) vs set number,
the bottom two plots show the mass cut width (MassH-MassL) vs. set number.
Left 2 plots are for large cells, right two plots are for small cells.
Each set of 4 plots is for one energy bin, starting from the lowest energy
Set number is defined as 10*(day_of_year)+(set), where a single set contains 5-10 runs
This is run 12 pp510 longitudinal
- dilks's blog
- Login or register to post comments