- fisyak's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (6)
- July (3)
- June (3)
- March (1)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2023
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (4)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2022
- 2021
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (5)
- January (4)
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- December (3)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (7)
- July (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2016
- 2015
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (3)
- January (1)
- 2014
- 2013
- December (4)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Compare 3D and Full Grid Leak corrections.
Updated on Wed, 2017-07-12 10:45. Originally created by fisyak on 2017-07-12 10:45.
I made Track by Track comparison Gene’s 3D and Full GridLeack fits for 2017 pp510 for runs 18075005-18075086
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~fisyak/star/TbyT/2017/indexFull3D.php
Two sets of plots obtained with Gene’s sample (500 events, on right) and higher statistics (216142 events, on left).
I want to point
1. Fig. 16-18 : difference in reconstructed pT for global tracks ~ 0.75% *pT^2
2. Fig. 33: efficiency for primary tracks, the main difference around -30 degrees is due to sector 20.
3. Fig. 39-40: difference in reconstructed pT for primary tracks ~ 0.5% *pT^2
»
- fisyak's blog
- Login or register to post comments