- fisyak's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (6)
- July (3)
- June (3)
- March (1)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2023
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (4)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2022
- 2021
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (5)
- January (4)
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- December (3)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (7)
- July (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2016
- 2015
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (3)
- January (1)
- 2014
- 2013
- December (4)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Compare primary track quality from Runs 16132028 (normal parameters) and 16132032 (changed daq/ALTRO).
Updated on Mon, 2015-05-18 08:58. Originally created by fisyak on 2015-05-18 08:57.
Tonko took a few runs with changed daq/ALTRO parameters.
I have compared two runs :
16131028, normal run with standard parameters, (tof emc eemc pp2pp bsmd esmd tpx pxl mtd ist sst gmt fps daq trg), and
16131032, Altro theresold was increased from 3 to 4, no. of time buckets read decreased from 415 to 370, (tof emc eemc pp2pp bsmd esmd tpx pxl mtd ist sst gmt fps daq trg).
For these runs I compared :
- no. of good tracks at the best primary vertex,
- no. of his on the good tracks, and
- no. of dE/dx meaurements per track.
I don't see any significant differences.
»
- fisyak's blog
- Login or register to post comments