- fisyak's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- November (1)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (6)
- July (3)
- June (3)
- March (1)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2023
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (4)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2022
- 2021
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (5)
- January (4)
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- December (3)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (7)
- July (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2016
- 2015
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (3)
- January (1)
- 2014
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
No. of primary track versus HFT hit pattern for AuAu200 low luminosity run 2014
Updated on Wed, 2015-02-25 17:43. Originally created by fisyak on 2015-02-23 18:24.
A plot below was taken from Track By Track comparision of TPC only and TPC+HFT reconstruction for y2014 AuAu200 low luminosity runs (days 84-90) (see http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~fisyak/star/TbyT/2014).
The plot is presenting ratio no. of primary tracks to global ones (with |eta| < 0.5) versus HFT hit pattern = no. of Pixel hits + 10 *(no. of Ist hits)
for TPC only (bullets) and TPC+HFT (squares) reconstruction for positive (black) and negative (red) tracks.
- TPC only gives the ratio ~ 0.55
- TPC+HFT gives :
- No. HFT hit : ~0.42;
- Pixel and no Ist hits : ~0.25
- Pixel and 1 Ist hit : ~0.50
- Pixel and 2 Ist hit : ~0.25
- The conclusion from this plot is that
- pixel hits without Ist damage about 50% of primary tracks,
- the requirement to have one Ist hit shows no damange due to pixle hits
- 2 Ist hits situation is not clear. I guess that this is statistically unsignificant.
»
- fisyak's blog
- Login or register to post comments