- fisyak's home page
- Posts
- 2025
- 2024
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (6)
- July (3)
- June (3)
- March (1)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2023
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (4)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2022
- 2021
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (5)
- January (4)
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- December (3)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (7)
- July (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2016
- 2015
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (3)
- January (1)
- 2014
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Run XIII pp 500p2 (days 127-161) dE/dx. The first look.
I have checked dE/dx results for the Part 2 (days 127-161) of Run XIII pp 510 data with calibration constrants obtained in Part 1 (days 074-126).
(See for reference Part 1 results at https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/RunXIII_pp500p1_dEdx.pdf)
The results are summarize as two plot sets resolution and shift versus Tpc track length for P2 and P1.
The conclusions:
1. The resolution in P2 is increased by 0.1% (P1 :7.45 % => P2: 7.53%).
2. The systematical shift is increased by ~0.6% (P1: 0.11% => P2: 0.77%).
3. The full scale calibration will not give us much.
4. Any way it would be useful to make more checks but I would say that we can declare that
we already have a resonable dE/dx calibration for Part 2 (days 127-161) of Run XIII pp 510 data
- fisyak's blog
- Login or register to post comments