- genevb's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- September (1)
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- October (4)
- September (2)
- August (6)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- 2018
- 2017
- December (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2015
- December (1)
- October (1)
- September (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (9)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (5)
- October (3)
- September (3)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (7)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2012
- December (2)
- November (6)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (7)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (3)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2011
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (9)
- March (5)
- February (6)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (3)
- November (6)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (5)
- July (1)
- June (4)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2009
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (6)
- August (4)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (5)
- April (5)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- 2008
- 2005
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Run 12 issue with ZDC scalers during UU193
The TPC SpaceCharge & GridLeak calibration which was done for the P12ic preview physics production of Run 12 UU193 used the ZDC sum (zdce+zdcw). I looked a little more carefully at these scalers using my scaler ntuples, and found there are some issues with these scalers...
First is a plot of zdce/zdcw (blue) and zdcenk/zdcwnk (red) vs. day ("nk" means "no-killer-bit", and I used (t-1.303e9)/(24*3600)-258.4 as an approximation of day in eastern time...it's close enough for this purpose):
Next is the three ZDC scalers using killer bits divided by no-killer bits: zdcx/zdcxnk + 2 (black), zdce/zdcenk + 1 (red), zdcw/zdcwnk (blue):
While I can be confident the problems with the east and west are in zdce and zdcw (killer bit versions), I wasn't sure about the coincidence rate until I compared it to bbcx. The next plot is zdcx/bbcx (blue) and zdcxnk/bbcx (red). The latter shows the step in the middle of day 122 which is seen above in zdcx/zdcxnk, implicating zdcxnk.
_______
One additional important check: the above were all made using the 60-second-averaged scalers stored in the DB every 30 seconds. Do the 1-second readings which are stored with the data stream show the same issues? Here is zdce/zdcw from a random sampling of P12ic MuDsts, showing that the problem exists in that data as well:
-Gene
p.s. Jamie pointed out a relevant note in the ShiftLog for day 130 at 15:21: "splitters from ZDC PMT for all 6 channels with 80/20 split; both (80/20) go to summer separately before sent to QT"
- genevb's blog
- Login or register to post comments