- pagebs's home page
- Posts
- 2017
- June (1)
- 2016
- 2015
- 2014
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (4)
- June (4)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2012
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (3)
- July (3)
- June (6)
- May (2)
- April (3)
- March (3)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (7)
- September (3)
- August (2)
- July (5)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (4)
- March (2)
- January (1)
- 2010
- December (2)
- October (4)
- September (1)
- August (4)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- March (4)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2009
- December (1)
- November (2)
- October (1)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (1)
- February (1)
- January (6)
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Run 9 200GeV Dijet Cross Section Test
First look at the dijet cross section ...
Here I look at the dijet cross section for events which had an L2JetHigh jet triggered (JP2-JP2, JP2-JP1Lo, JP2-UnJP2). The idea was to find the cross section for the easiest possible case, so I looked only at L2JetHigh triggers in the barrel (-0.8 to 0.8 in eta) correcting using only the Bin-by-Bin correction factor method.
Figure 1: This figure shows the data / simu comparisons for the jet pt spectrum, jet eta spectrum, and dijet mass spectrum.
Further data / simulation plots can be seen here.
Comparisons of the detector level, particle level, and truth level quantities can be seen here.
Figure 2: This figure shows the detector level, truth level, and raw data dijet mass spectra
Figure 3: This figure shows the correction factors (truth level / detector level) which will be applied to the raw data
Figure 4: This figure shows the particle level vs detector level dijet mass (response matrix). The only difference between the plots is the binning
Figure 5: The dijet cross section, data is in black and theory is in red. The data/theory ratio is shown below. Here I have assumed a integrated luminosity of 25 pb^-1. This is the 'best case' matching.
Figure 6: Same as figure 5, but now I use a better guess of the total integrated luminosity of my sample. The value I use is ~17.7 pb^-1.
Figure 7: Same as figure 6, but now an error in the application of the asymmetric pt cut to the theory curve has been fixed.
Groups:
- pagebs's blog
- Login or register to post comments