Paper Proposal: Search for Proton Clustering in Au+Au collisions from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan I
Paper title: Search for Proton Clustering in Au+Au collisions at \sqrt{sNN} = 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, 39, and 62.4 GeV at RHIC
PAs: Yunshan Cheng, Huan Huang, Dylan Neff, Gang Wang
Target Journal: PRC
Paper Draft: ver2
Analysis Note: ver1
Comments & Discussions
Comments from PWG Paper Proposal 5/8/25
Comments from PWGC Paper Preview 7/11/25
Abstract:
Proton clustering in high-energy heavy-ion collisions may serve as an experimental probe of a first-order phase transition in the Quantum Chromodynamics phase diagram. In this work, we report STAR measurements of the novel \Delta\sigma^2 observable to search for proton clustering using data from the first phase of the Beam Energy Scan program at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. The \Delta\sigma^2 observable quantifies azimuthal correlations among protons by comparing their variance in localized partitions to a binomial baseline. We analyze Au+Au collision data at \sqrt{sNN} = 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, 39, and 62.4 GeV and compare the results with model predictions from AMPT and MUSIC+FIST. Our findings reveal significantly negative \Delta\sigma^2 values, suggesting a repulsive correlation among protons that strongly depends on event multiplicity and qualitatively resembles the effects of global transverse momentum conservation. While correlation strengths versus multiplicity in AMPT simulations follow an energy-independent universal curve, STAR data exhibit an energy-dependent trend. Additionally, we extract the correlation range among protons by examining the partition width dependence of \Delta\sigma^2.
Figures for the paper:
Figure 1. Example event with six total protons, including three within a 120° (shaded area). Red arrows represent the directions of the proton momenta.
Figure 2. \Delta \sigma^2 with w = 120° vs the total proton multiplicity (N) from the same events (circle), the mixed events (square), and the difference (star) in the most central 0--5% Au+Au collisions at \sqrt{sNN} = 39 GeV. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties, and the shaded boxes denote the systematic uncertainties.
Figure 3. The dependence of \Delta \sigma^2(w = 120°) on Np is shown for three levels of correction: uncorrected (circles), corrected using mixed events (squares), and further corrected for v2 (stars), for 30-40% Au+Au collisions at \sqrt{sNN} = 39 GeV.
Figure 4. Event plane resolution < cos[2(\Psi2f -\Psi2b )] > as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at \sqrt{sNN} = 7.7-62.4 GeV. Only the statistical uncertainties are shown. Some points are slightly shifted horizontally to improve clarity.
Figure 5. Proton v2{\eta-sub} as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at \sqrt{sNN} = 7.7-62.4 GeV. Only the statistical uncertainties are shown. Some points are slightly shifted horizontally to improve clarity.
Figure 6. \Delta \sigma^2 (w=120°) vs Np in 0--5% Au+Au collisions at six beam energies from STAR data (red circles). The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties, and the shaded boxes denote the systematic uncertainties. For comparison, we also plot simulations from AMPT (blue bands), default MUSIC+FIST (black bands), and MUSIC+FIST with an excluded-volume effect (gray bands). The horizontal dashed lines represent the weighted averages <\Delta \sigma^2> of each data set, obtained with Eq. 9.
Figure 7. (a) < \Delta \sigma^2 (w=120°) > vs Npart from STAR data (open markers) and AMPT simulations (dashed lines) at the beam energies under study. The solid curve represents the universal fit using Eq. 11. (b) STAR data after subtraction of the universal fit curve. Some points are slightly shifted horizontally to improve clarity.
Figure 8. Same as Fig. 7, but as a function of RefMult.
Figure 9. <\Delta \sigma^2 > as a function of w in 0--5% Au+Au collisions at various beam energies from STAR (red circles). The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties, and the shaded boxes denote the systematic uncertainties. For comparison, we also plot simulations from AMPT (blue bands), default MUSIC+FIST (black bands), and MUSIC+FIST with an excluded-volume effect (gray bands). The STAR points are fit using a quadratic function described in Eq. 12.
Figure 10. The baseline b as a function of RefMult from STAR data. b is extracted using the quadratic fit to < \Delta \sigma^2(w) >, as defined in Eq. 12. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties, and the shaded boxes denote the systematic uncertainties. The solid curves represent the fits using Eq. 11. For comparison, we also plot AMPT simulations (dashed lines).
Figure 11. Fit parameters (a) C0, (b) C1, and (c) n as a function of collision energy from Fig. 10 using Eq. 11. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties, and the shaded boxes denote the systematic uncertainties. For comparison, the AMPT resutls are shown with open circles.
Figure 12. The inverse curvature z as a function of RefMult from (a) STAR data and (b) AMPT simulations. z is extracted using the quadratic fit to < \Delta \sigma^2 (w)) >, as defined in Eq. 12. The vertical bars represent the statistical uncertainties, and the shaded boxes denote the systematic uncertainties. The solid curve represents a second-order polynomial fit.
Conclusion:
Previous Presentations:
- July 11 2025 - PWGC Preview
- May 8 2025 - CF PWG Paper Proposal
- February 6 2025 - CF PWG Analysis Recap
- August 3 2023 - Quark Matter 2023 Prelim Request
- July 27 2023 - https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/dneff/Neff-CF-Meeting-72723
- July 13 2023 - https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Neff_CF_pwg_7_13_23.pdf
Related Method paper: https://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.064905
- yunshancheng's blog
- Login or register to post comments