2009.01.20 Away side jet pt vs. photon pt: more stats for QCD pt_parton 9-15GeV
Ilya Selyuzhenkov January 20, 2009
Note:
this is an update with 10x more statitstics for QCD 9-15GeV parton pt bin.
See this post for old results.
Data sets
- pp2006 - STAR 2006 pp longitudinal data (~ 3.164 pb^1)
Trigger: eemc-http-mb-L2gamma [id:137641]
- gamma-jet[gamma-filtered] - data-driven Prompt Photon [p6410EemcGammaFilter] events.
Partonic pt range 2-25 GeV.
- QCD jets[gamma-filtered] - data-driven QCD [p6410EemcGammaFilter] events.
Partonic pt range 2-25 GeV.
Cuts applied
- Di-jet events
- Require to reconstruct photon momentum (no gamma-jet isolation cuts)
- Gamma pt > 7GeV
- L2gamma emulation in Monte-Carlo
- L2gamma triggered pp2006 events
Comments
- Vertex z distributions from QCD MC and pp2006 data
are different in the negative region (see Fig.1)
- pp2006 data to Monte-Carlo ratio
does not depends on reconstructed photon pt,
but it has some vertex z dependence
(see data to MC ratio in Fig.6 for pre-shower1 > 4MeV case)
Figures
Figure 1: Vertex z distribution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9186b/9186b2f0480ade6cd04aec81de62e741f8734880" alt=""
Figure 2: Away side jet pt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/633d9/633d9f1e9db9d8a1a872dd08c60066aba2c04bef" alt=""
Figure 3: Photon pt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a9ef/5a9ef2b3d193e7e917e5c901cad78f4aa92acd82" alt=""
Figure 4: gamma-jet pt asymmetry: (pt_gamma - pt_jet)/pt_gamma
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac81f/ac81f70f628d08e7a411739dc8e4a58e42dd078a" alt=""
Figure 5: gamma pt vs. away side jet pt
1st column: triggered pp2006 data
2nd column: gamma-jet MC (l2gamma trigger on)
3rd column: QCD background MC (l2gamma trigger on)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dc4/59dc4a0fb0c0e8fac385c8d91ca66bf60bc3eed2" alt=""
Data to Monte_Carlo normalization
Figure 6: pp2006 data to Monte -Carlo sum [QCD + gamma-jet] ratio
for pre-shower1>4MeV (most of statistics)
Left: data to MC ratio vs. reconstructed gamma pt.
Solid line shows constant line fit (p0 ~ 1.3)
Right: data to MC ratio vs. reconstructed vertex position
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8df7/d8df793271efc2571cd30b794280d08a650ab62a" alt=""