2009.10.27: Jason EEMC geometry: comparison without LOW_EM option
Monte-Carlo setup:
- One photon per event
- Disabled new SMD layers (EXPS EBLS EFLS) in Jason geometry
- EEMC only and Full STAR geometry configurations without LOW_EM option
(using Victor's geometry fix)
- Throw particles flat in eta (1.08, 2.0), phi (0, 2pi), and pt (6-10 GeV)
- Using A2Emaker to get reconstructed Tower/SMD energy
(no EEMC SlowSimulator in chain)
- Vertex z=0
- ~50K/per particle type
- Non-zero energy: 3 sigma above pedestal
Geometry configurations and notations (shown in the center of the plot):
- eemc-cvs: EEMC only with geometry file from CVS (cAir-fixed)
- full-cvs: Full STAR with geometry file from CVS (cAir-fixed)
- eemc-j-noL: EEMC only with Jason geometry file (disabled 3-new SMD layers)
- full-j-noL: Full STAR with Jason geometry file (disabled 3-new SMD layers)
Figure 1: Sampling fraction 1x1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/261c4/261c4df3b3ba102068b6166e5376355847de9c43" alt=""
Figure 2: Sampling fraction 2x1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/240e7/240e71aa1016f50446bd543243f8a18eccc0b97a" alt=""
Figure 3: Sampling fraction 3x3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d36c/3d36c0bed140b083423f1fe0210e7979dd615696" alt=""
Figure 4: Sampling fraction total energy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bec8b/bec8b50a238f9a8d1f0ddc2629f2bc89d8245acb" alt=""
Figure 5: Sampling fraction pre1-shower
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec4b/eec4b15531cb3161422350689e090a4b225aeff5" alt=""
Figure 6: Sampling fraction pre2-shower
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62050/6205035368bf02eb148f99db680b143f1609c635" alt=""
Figure 7: Sampling fraction smd-u
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7070b/7070b85936b91a05f96db9436866d48bc54c552a" alt=""
Figure 8: Sampling fraction smd-v
Figure 9: Sampling fraction post-shower
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1e2e/b1e2ef35ad6217d96a78cdcfe369b79381025df9" alt=""
Sampling fraction vs. thrown energy
Figure 10: Sampling fraction 1x1 vs. thrown energy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/436c0/436c0effb91afa0c9d761c98a6c25ce67b557be7" alt=""
Figure 11: Sampling fraction 2x1 vs. thrown energy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac18f/ac18fd1648201b5c820ab22f0ddf079806d419c6" alt=""
Figure 12: Sampling fraction 3x3 vs. thrown energy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d434/5d434032af068f429c1d971694af32b524d6d351" alt=""
Figure 13: Sampling fraction (tatal energy) vs. thrown energy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e8d3/9e8d37901c2ef5bbe3e1415f3c52c8c47cb06996" alt=""