2009.11.23 New EEMC geometry (CVS v6.1): y2006 vs. y2009 STAR configurations
Monte-Carlo setup:
- Throwing one photon per event
- Compare new EEMC geometry in CVS for y2006 and 2009 configurations
- Full STAR geometry configurations with and without LOW_EM option
- Throw particles flat in eta (1.08, 2.0), phi (0, 2pi), and energy (5-35 GeV)
- Using A2Emaker to get reconstructed Tower/SMD energy (no EEMC SlowSimulator in chain)
- Vertex z=0
- ~50K/per particle type
- Non-zero energy: 3 sigma above pedestal
Geometry configurations
- red: full STAR y2009, with/without LOW_EM, EEMC geometry
- black: full STAR y2006, with/without LOW_EM, EEMC geometry v6.1
Figure 1: EEMC sampling fraction (left) distribution (right) vs. thrown photon energy (1.2 < eta < 1.9; no pt cuts)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44806/448068382d8025177819873826c9fac6d61aff66" alt=""
Figure 2: EEMC sampling fraction (left) distribution (right) vs. thrown photon energy (1.2 < eta < 1.9; pt > 7GeV cut)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0dea/c0deaaa9055c38d16aec6bc14db397a78a679eec" alt=""
Figure 3: 2x1/3x3 clustering
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0471/d0471c4e058652df143d7be6485939fb9337705d" alt=""
Figure 4: Shower shapes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9354f/9354f7564bcbe9741a3ef0d7382bf6b786fae5d2" alt=""
Figure 5: Shower shape ratios (v plane)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8d92/b8d9282a397abcfb1677cb7d24da1908b555a1b1" alt=""
Figure 6: Shower shape ratios (u plane)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd3c4/dd3c413d6e33494b5a556e88c63ff0f05b0d782c" alt=""
Figure 7: Pre-shower migration (1.2 < eta < 1.9; no pt cuts)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/590f2/590f2d708db0f213acfb75416f35da65287eece9" alt=""