The STAR experiment

1) Paper preview: Probing QCD phase structure with precision elliptic flow measurements of multistrange hadrons in Au + Au collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 7.7 - 19.6 GeV at RHIC
     - Brief introduction from the PWG conveners (5’) []     

     - Open discussions (35')

     - Summary from the conveners' panel (5’)

2) 32 bit vs 64 bit library validation           20% of Au+Au 19.6 GeV from Run 19 
         --- production done Gene for validation studies
         Proposed to use 200M MB events each from Run16 Au+Au and 200 M BHT1 triggered events from Run17 p+p MB for the validation production.
         --- Some issues. Run16 library couldnt be compiled on 64bit. Would 2019 Au+Au 200 GeV be good for the purpose?
         --- Run17 200 M HT events is a large sample. Reduce to 100 M? 

      - Simulation validation study by Jae SLIDES. Are the differences acceptable?

3) Data production QA
      - Impact of alignment on st_W stream production with SL24a. SLIDES from Jae -- What would be the physics impact? Acceptable?
      - Please have a discussion at the PWG meeting on what observables should be QAd for data production QA and inform the QA volunteers 

4) Datasets for deletion
      - LINK from Gene 
      - Latest BES-II productions LIST 

 

1) Paper preview: Observation of Strange Dibaryon (|S| = 3)
     - Brief introduction from the PWG conveners (5’) [Xin Dong]     

     - Open discussions (35')

     - Summary from the conveners' panel (5’)

2) 32 bit vs 64 bit library validation           20% of Au+Au 19.6 GeV from Run 19
         10% of p+p 510 GeV from Run 17? -- How much statistics is needed here for basic tests for HP, ColdQCD?

 

1) Paper preview: Measurement of system size dependence of directed flow of protons (anti-protons) at RHIC
     - Brief introduction from the PWG conveners (5’) []     

     - Open discussions (35')

     - Summary from the conveners' panel (5’)

2) 32 bit vs 64 bit library validation           20% of Au+Au 19.6 GeV from Run 19 
         --- production started by Gene for validation studies
         Propose to use 200M events each from Run16 Au+Au and Run17 p+p MB for the validation production. Is this good? 

3) PWG QA helpers
      - So far feedback from LFSUPC. Others please follow up. Please proactively reach out and identify volunteers
      - Please have a discussion at the PWG meeting on what observables should be QAd for data production QA and inform the QA volunteers 

4) Embedding priorities 
      - LIST
      - Only a few requests for prioritizing so far 
      - Please inform on the old requests (2023 and earlier in the list)