Earlier this week, we discovered that we had been using two different constituent cuts between p+p and Au+Au: in p+p, I had been using pTtrk = (0.2, 20) GeV/c; and in Au+Au, Nihar had been using pTtrk = (0.2, 15) GeV/c.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/dmawxc/update-09242018-run-9-pp-unfolding-systematics-no-bin-bin-comparison-and-better-summin-0
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/dmawxc/update-09222018-run-9-pp-unfolding-systematics-9-11-gev-pi0-r-02

So to make things consistent between the two, I re-ran my analysis using pTtrk = (0.2, 15) GeV/c (since it's much faster than re-doing the analysis in Au+Au).  This post is for posterity, the results from the redone analysis were incorporated into Nihar's HP2018 presentation on Wednesday (the 26th), and below I show the systematics and final unfolded result with the new constituent cuts.

Pythia Uncertainty:

Efficiency Uncertainty:

Method Uncertainty:

Prior Uncertainty:

Unfolded Result: