- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- Top bloggers
- Recent posts
Sort by:[Date]
Run 13 BEMC Calibration : Relative Calibration [MIP analysis]
Updated on Sat, 2016-04-02 08:35. Originally created by devika on 2015-02-24 10:26.Run 13 BEMC Calibration : Relative Calibration [MIP analysis]
Run-13 -Period1 BEMC-Calibration
Distributions requested by EMC meeting on 11/10/15 of various trigger options : (click here)
*******************
cluster_eng_momentum_cut_for_outtermost2_eta_rings
EMC-draft-08-18-15
compare <E/P> vs 1/3x3 isolation ratio (ratio-not corrected) between E in <E/P> is corrected single tower energy and E in <E/P> being non-corrected 2x2 cluster energy. ---plots
clusterEng_E/Pfit_ringbyring
2x2cluserEng VS TDR and singleTowerEng Vs TDR
TDR-Vs-1/3x3_isolation
TDR-1D distribution_ring-by-ring--BHT3 trigger
MIP-Gain-Luminosity dependance-period1
zdc1 -> <zdc> ~200K - (MIPGainzdc1 -MIPGainzdc2)/ MIPGainzdc1
zdc2 -> <zdc> ~280K - (MIPGainzdc1 -MIPGainzdc3)/ MIPGainzdc1
zdc3 -> <zdc> ~350K - (MIPGainzdc2 -MIPGainzdc3)/ MIPGainzdc2
zdc3 -> <zdc> ~350K - (MIPGainzdc2 -MIPGainzdc3)/ MIPGainzdc2
Z_vertex distribution with increasing luminosity
ZDC-dependance-on-BHT1-trigger-electron-postron-asymmtery
Is the E/P drop with momentum really a artifact of Momentum cuts?
BHT1-Energy-distributions-in-momentum-slices
BHT1-Mean-EoverPvs-of-electrons-and-positrons-in-momentum
BHT1-EoverP-vs-momentum slices-Electron-and-postron-Distributions-with-statistics
BHT1-mean-E/P vs ringID (eta) for electrons and positrons
BHT3-EoverPvsP-2D-plots
BHT3-MeanEoverP-in-momentum-slices
BHT3-MeanEoverP-of-electrons-and-positrons-in-momentum-slices
BHT3-Energy-distribution-in-momentum-slices
BHT3-EoverP-vs-momentum-slices-Electron-and-positron-Distributions-with-statistics
BHT3-EoverP-vs-ringID
Unbiased-EoverP-vs-ringID
Track Cuts:
Isolation cut:
Iso_cut
Iso_cut_vs_Energy
Iso_cut_vs_momentum
Iso_cut_vs_EoverP
minimum nHits cut 10-> 25
05/28/2015
Renee's Proposal
BHT3 - threshold=7.3 GeV
conditions:
if ( ( (BHT3&&BHT3->DidFire()) && !(BHT2&&BHT2->DidFire()) &&
conditions:
if ( ( (BHT3&&BHT3->DidFire()) && !(BHT2&&BHT2->DidFire()) &&
!(BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) && !(BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT3->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT2- threshold=6.0 GeV
condition:
if ( ( (BHT2&&BHT2->DidFire()) && !(BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) &&
!(BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT2->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT1 - threshold=4.2 GeV
condition:
if ( ( (BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) && ! (BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT1->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT0 - threshold=2.6 GeV
condition:
if (BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire()) BHT0->Fill()
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
JP2
Condition:
if (JP2&&JP2->DidFire()) JP2->Fill()
EoverPvsP Mom-5-10 Mom-7-10 meanE/PvsP
{
BHT3->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT2- threshold=6.0 GeV
condition:
if ( ( (BHT2&&BHT2->DidFire()) && !(BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) &&
!(BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT2->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT1 - threshold=4.2 GeV
condition:
if ( ( (BHT1&&BHT1->DidFire()) && ! (BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire() ) )
{
BHT1->Fill();
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
BHT0 - threshold=2.6 GeV
condition:
if (BHT0&&BHT0->DidFire()) BHT0->Fill()
EoverPvsP meanE/PvsP
********************************
JP2
Condition:
if (JP2&&JP2->DidFire()) JP2->Fill()
EoverPvsP Mom-5-10 Mom-7-10 meanE/PvsP
Forward Upgrade Proposal / GSTAR Implementation (10 disk) - GEM option
Updated on Tue, 2015-02-24 07:59. Originally created by surrow on 2015-02-24 07:59.
No. of primary track versus HFT hit pattern for AuAu200 low luminosity run 2014
Updated on Wed, 2015-02-25 17:43. Originally created by fisyak on 2015-02-23 18:24.A plot below was taken from Track By Track comparision of TPC only and TPC+HFT reconstruction for y2014 AuAu200 low luminosity runs (days 84-90) (see http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~fisyak/s
Forward Upgrade Proposal / R&D needs - GEM option
Updated on Tue, 2015-02-24 07:58. Originally created by surrow on 2015-02-23 16:45.
Proposed FMS target gains
Updated on Mon, 2015-02-23 15:50. Originally created by gagliard on 2015-02-23 15:50.OSU EPD Testbench WITH PAGE NUMBERS
Updated on Mon, 2015-02-23 13:19. Originally created by iupsal on 2015-02-23 13:19.OSU EPD Testbench, BES meeting Feb23 2015
Updated on Mon, 2015-02-23 13:04. Originally created by iupsal on 2015-02-23 13:04.
Iteration0
Updated on Mon, 2015-02-23 02:03. Originally created by heppel on 2015-02-22 15:46.I am starting the analysis data with iteration 0 voltages (but with 1 crate of Lecroy supplies for Large South removed)
DIS 2015 Abstract
Updated on Tue, 2015-02-24 11:45. Originally created by drach09 on 2015-02-21 14:07.Run 15 Tests 1
Updated on Fri, 2015-02-20 01:05. Originally created by heppel on 2015-02-19 23:08.The following is the distribution of the sum of ADC counts for run 16049006 and short trigger test runs 16050060, 16050061, 16050062.