- General information
- Data readiness
- Calibration
- BeamLine Constraint
- Run 10, Au+Au 200 GeV
- Run 10, Au+Au 39 GeV
- Run 11
- Run 12
- Run 13
- Run 15 pAu200
- Run 15 pp200
- Run 2 (200 GeV pp)
- Run 3 (200 GeV dAu and pp)
- Run 4 (pp)
- Run 5
- Run 6 (pp)
- Run 6: Issues with 2006 BeamLine calibration
- Run 7 (200GeV AuAu)
- Run 8 (200 GeV dAu and pp)
- Run 8 (9GeV AuAu)
- Run 9 (pp500 and pp200)
- Run 9, pp200 GeV Full Field (FF) - new calibration (May 2012)
- Calibration Run preparation
- Calibration Schedules
- Calibration topics by dataset
- Docs
- STAR Automated Calibration Project
- SVT Calibrations
- TPC Calibrations
- BeamLine Constraint
- Databases
- Quality Assurance
- Calibration
- Grid and Cloud
- Infrastructure
- Machine Learning
- Offline Software
- Production
- S&C internal group meetings
- Test tree
Run 15 pp200 preliminary 2
Updated on Mon, 2015-05-11 16:38. Originally created by genevb on 2015-05-08 14:31.
Under:
The first preliminary calibration, using HFT only, found (x0,y0) = (0.01, -0.24), using a production of data from run 16048027. The HFT cannot, however, determine a beam tilt. Using the same data, with TPC-found primary vertices, I find similar (x0,y0) = (0.002 ± 0.003, -0.259 ± 0.003), which is only different by ~1/5th of a mm. I find slopes of dx/dz = -0.00040 ± 0.00007, and dy/dz = 0.00045 ± 0.00007. As I did for the pAu preliminary calibration, I will use the HFT-found intercepts, and the TPC-found slopes.
-Gene
-Gene
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments