- General information
- Data readiness
- Calibration
- BeamLine Constraint
- Calibration Run preparation
- Calibration Schedules
- Calibration topics by dataset
- Docs
- STAR Automated Calibration Project
- SVT Calibrations
- TPC Calibrations
- Drift velocity
- Enter TPC gains into database
- Field Cage Shorts
- Miscellaneous TPC calibration notes
- Padrow 13 and Padrow 40 static distortions
- RunXI dE/dx calibration recipe
- SpaceCharge and GridLeak
- SpaceCharge and GridLeak Calibration How-To Guide
- Effect of SVT and SSD on SpaceCharge Calibration
- SpaceCharge azimuthal anisotropy
- AuAu15 (2014)
- AuAu19 (2011)
- AuAu200 (2004)
- AuAu200 (2007)
- AuAu200 (2011)
- AuAu200 (2014)
- AuAu200 (2016)
- AuAu27 (2011)
- CuAu200 (2012)
- CuCu200 (2005)
- CuCu22 (2005)
- GridLeak R&D
- UU193 (2012)
- dAu20 (2016)
- dAu200 (2008)
- dAu200 (2016)
- dAu39 (2016)
- dAu62 (2016)
- pAl200 (2015)
- pAu200 (2015)
- pp200 (2006)
- pp200 (2009)
- pp200 (2015)
- pp400 (2005)
- pp500 (2011)
- pp510 (2012)
- pp510 (2013)
- pp62 (2006)
- TPC Hit Errors
- TPC OmegaTau
- TPC Sector Alignment
- TPC Slewing
- TPC T0s
- TPC de/dx
- TPC survey instructions
- Twist (ExB) Distortion
- Databases
- Quality Assurance
- Calibration
- Grid and Cloud
- Infrastructure
- Machine Learning
- Offline Software
- Production
- S&C internal group meetings
- Test tree
First look
Updated on Thu, 2005-11-17 14:41. Originally created by genevb on 2005-10-24 12:55.
When I plot dca vs. zdce+zdcw, pp400 looks identical to pp200! Plotting dca vs. bbce+bbcw (which is the scaler quantity used for correcting pp200 data), shows that there is a difference! I was nearly fooled. In the following plots, pp200 are black points, while pp400 are red.
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments