- BEMC
- BEMC Detector Operator Manual
- Calibrations
- Database
- Hardware
- Mapping
- Service Tasks
- Software
- Useful Documents
- EEMC
- ETOF
- FCS
- FGT
- FPD & FMS & FPS
- FTPC
- FTT
- HLT
- L3
- PMD
- PP2PP
- RICH
- Roman Pot Phase II*
- SSD
- SVT
- Slow Controls
- TPC
- TRG
- Trigger Detectors
- VPD
- test
Comparison of Online and Offline Calibrations
Updated on Thu, 2006-12-21 19:14. Originally created by kocolosk on 2006-12-07 14:06.
Under:
Now, the interesting thing is the relative changes of offline-online for the east side and the west side. If I only plot the location of towers whose gains increased by more than 20% I get
There were only 12 towers whose gains decreased by 20%; all of them were on the west side. Finally here's a plot of the E_T change of the remaining towers:
I think the message here is clear: the gains on the east side have increased more than the gains on the west side! It's possible that the use of the online calibration in previous Run 6 jet studies is at least partially responsible for the obsereved east-west jet asymmetry.
To get quantitative about this effect we have to go to 1D. I've attached a PDF of eta-ring by eta-ring histograms like the first one on this page. The first two pages are the east side; the next two are the west side. I've found it easiest to analyze if you set your Reader to view two pages at a time; then you'll be comparing towers with the same absolute value of pseudorapidity when you flip. The conclusion is pretty clear: at midrapidity the difference in offline - online E_T floats around 5 - 8 GeV on the east side, but it's only about 2 - 5 GeV on the west side.
Introduction:
This page compares the online and first offline calibrations. The online calibration table was generated during data-taking using a single long run processed through fastOffline production and uploaded on March 30th. It uses slopes to set the relative gains in an eta-ring and then normalizes the eta-rings using MIPs. The first offline calibration uses a significant fraction of the produced transverse and late longitudinal runs. It sets the relative gains using MIP peaks and then uses electron E/p to set the absolute scale. It was uploaded on December 7th.Body Counts:
138 additonal towers are masked in this first offline calibration, leaving 4517 good towers. 1 tower (2916) was masked before but is now listed as OK. To be honest, I have no idea why it was masked in the online calib; its slope looks fine to me.Plots:
The electron E/p scaling in the offline calibration increased the gains by an approximately uniform 10 percent (more at the edges). This effect is seen in the following plot of offline E_T - online E_T, integrated over all towers that were good in both calibrations:Now, the interesting thing is the relative changes of offline-online for the east side and the west side. If I only plot the location of towers whose gains increased by more than 20% I get
There were only 12 towers whose gains decreased by 20%; all of them were on the west side. Finally here's a plot of the E_T change of the remaining towers:
I think the message here is clear: the gains on the east side have increased more than the gains on the west side! It's possible that the use of the online calibration in previous Run 6 jet studies is at least partially responsible for the obsereved east-west jet asymmetry.
To get quantitative about this effect we have to go to 1D. I've attached a PDF of eta-ring by eta-ring histograms like the first one on this page. The first two pages are the east side; the next two are the west side. I've found it easiest to analyze if you set your Reader to view two pages at a time; then you'll be comparing towers with the same absolute value of pseudorapidity when you flip. The conclusion is pretty clear: at midrapidity the difference in offline - online E_T floats around 5 - 8 GeV on the east side, but it's only about 2 - 5 GeV on the west side.
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments