Sort by:[Date]

Upsilon Trigger Efficiency Calculation for pp2006 triggers-> Upsilon 400 series

I have switched to running over the upsilon 400 series for this analysis until the new embeded set is available.

pixel geometry - code changes

chain working in starnew (SL08d):

 

BFC:WARN  - StBFChain::Setup

QA :INFO  - ==============================================

PPV Revision 1.29 +low pt- high luminosity fmsslow trigger evaluation

daq files are at:

/star/data03/daq/2008/068/9068124f
 

MuDst files are at:

/star/data05/scratch/rjreed/PPV2008Eval/MuDstPt100fmshigh
 

Upsilon Trigger Efficiency Calculation for pp2006 triggers-> L2 Trigger 2

From:

Upsilon Trigger Efficiency Calculation for pp2006 triggers-> L0 Trigger

Ignoring the problems with the acceptance efficiency, I can still calculate trigger efficiencies.  The L0 trigger requirement is: a 3 tower cluster > 4 GeV.  In my code, I use the L2 s

Data Jet Distributions in Eta and Pt with Vertex Cut ( |vz| < 60 cm) for Fill 7847

Upsilon Trigger Efficiency Calculation for pp2006 triggers-> Acceptance 2

Geometric acceptance was originally found to be much higher, ~0.5

EMC calib accuracy for W program

 My thoughts about necessary calibration accuracy for a successful W program at STAR

BTOW calib 2008 w/ pi0 (by Alan)

 

 INPUT: 

  • Run=9047029
  • ideal gains
  • db status tables, peds
  • trigID=220520 = bht2-mb

Pio selection cuts:

Study of ET Correction Factor Gaussian Fit

ET Correction Factor Study using Gaussian Fits