- BEMC
- BEMC Detector Operator Manual
- Calibrations
- BPRS
- Run 8 BPRS Calibration
- 01 DB peds R9069005, 9067013
- 02 pedestal(capID)
- 03 tagging desynchronized capID
- 04 BPRS sees beam background?
- 05 ---- peds(softID,capID) & status table, ver=2.2, R9067013
- 06 MIP algo ver 1.1
- 07 BPRS peds vs. time
- 08 BPRS ped calculation using average
- 09 BPRS swaps, IGNORING Rory's finding from 2007, take 1
- 10 -------- BPRS swaps take2, _AFTER_ applying Rory's swaps
- 11 BPRS absolute gains from MIP, ver1.0 ( example of towers)
- 12 MIP gains ver1.0 (all tiles, also BTOW)
- 13 MIP algo, ver=1.1 (example of towers)
- 14 ---- MIP gains ver=1.6 , 90% of 4800 tiles ----
- 15 Broken BPRS channels ver=1.6, based on data from March of 2008
- 16 correlation of MIP ADC vs. raw slopes
- Run 9 BPRS Calibration
- Run 8 BPRS Calibration
- BSMD
- BTOW - Calibration Procedure
- Run 12 BTOW Calibration
- Run 3 BTOW Calibration
- Run 4 BTOW Calibration
- Run 5 BTOW Calibration
- Run 6 BTOW Calibration
- Run 7 BTOW Calibration
- Run 8 BTOW Calibration (2008)
- Run 9 BTOW Calibration
- BPRS
- Database
- Hardware
- Mapping
- Service Tasks
- Software
- Useful Documents
- EEMC
- ETOF
- FCS
- FGT
- FPD & FMS & FPS
- FTPC
- FTT
- HLT
- L3
- PMD
- PP2PP
- RICH
- Roman Pot Phase II*
- SSD
- SVT
- Slow Controls
- TPC
- TRG
- Trigger Detectors
- VPD
- test
07 BPRS peds vs. time
Updated on Tue, 2009-03-10 14:40. Originally created by mattheww on 2008-11-04 12:04.
Under:
Fig 1. Change of BPRS pedestal over ... within the same fill, see softID~1000
Pedestal residua (Y-axis) vs. softID (X-axis), same reference pedestals used from day 67 (so some peds are wrong for both runs) were used both plots.
Only fmsslow events, no further filtering, capID corruption fixed in fly.
Top run 9066001, start 0:11 am, fill 9989
Bottom run 9066012, start 2:02 am, fill 9989
Fig 2. Run list. system config was changed between those 2 runs marked in blue.
Fig 3. zoom in of run 9066001
Fig 4. another example of BPRS ped jump between runs: 9068022 & 9068032, both in the same fill.
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments