- BEMC
- BEMC Detector Operator Manual
- Calibrations
- BPRS
- Run 8 BPRS Calibration
- 01 DB peds R9069005, 9067013
- 02 pedestal(capID)
- 03 tagging desynchronized capID
- 04 BPRS sees beam background?
- 05 ---- peds(softID,capID) & status table, ver=2.2, R9067013
- 06 MIP algo ver 1.1
- 07 BPRS peds vs. time
- 08 BPRS ped calculation using average
- 09 BPRS swaps, IGNORING Rory's finding from 2007, take 1
- 10 -------- BPRS swaps take2, _AFTER_ applying Rory's swaps
- 11 BPRS absolute gains from MIP, ver1.0 ( example of towers)
- 12 MIP gains ver1.0 (all tiles, also BTOW)
- 13 MIP algo, ver=1.1 (example of towers)
- 14 ---- MIP gains ver=1.6 , 90% of 4800 tiles ----
- 15 Broken BPRS channels ver=1.6, based on data from March of 2008
- 16 correlation of MIP ADC vs. raw slopes
- Run 9 BPRS Calibration
- Run 8 BPRS Calibration
- BSMD
- BTOW - Calibration Procedure
- Run 12 BTOW Calibration
- Run 3 BTOW Calibration
- Run 4 BTOW Calibration
- Run 5 BTOW Calibration
- Run 6 BTOW Calibration
- Run 7 BTOW Calibration
- Run 8 BTOW Calibration (2008)
- Run 9 BTOW Calibration
- BPRS
- Database
- Hardware
- Mapping
- Service Tasks
- Software
- Useful Documents
- BTOF
- DAQ
- Detector Upgrades
- EEMC
- EPD
- ETOF
- FCS
- FGT
- FPD & FMS & FPS
- FTPC
- FTT
- HFT
- HLT
- L3
- MTD
- MTD NPS Maps
- PMD
- PP2PP
- RICH
- Roman Pot Phase II*
- Run-18 calibrations
- SSD
- SVT
- Slow Controls
- TPC
- TRG
- Trigger Detectors
- VPD
- test
08 BPRS ped calculation using average
Updated on Tue, 2009-03-10 14:41. Originally created by mattheww on 2008-11-05 12:35.
Under:
Comparison of accuracy of pedestal calculation using Gauss fit & plain average of all data.
The plain average method is our current scheme for ZS for BPRS & BSMD for 2009 data taking.
Fig 2. TOP: RMS of the plain average, using 13K of fmsslow-triggered events which are reasonable surrogate of minBias data for BPRS.
Middle: sigma of pedestal fit using Gauss shape
Bottom: ratio of pedestals from this 2 method. The typical pedestal value is of 170 ADC. I could not make root to display the difference, sorry.
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments